🔗 Share this article

A Danish man has been convicted of uploading nude scenes from protected films and TV series on the social media platform Reddit.

According to a law enforcement report reviewed by BBC News, the unnamed individual posted 347 clips of explicit scenes in a subreddit he managed, which were then watched 4.2 million-plus times.

The country's authorities state he has been handed a seven-month suspended sentence for copyright infringement.

Legal analysts say the defendant was prosecuted under a seldom-invoked clause in Denmark's intellectual property legislation, with the court ruling that by taking the scenes out of their original context, the man had harmed the performers' "ethical entitlements".

He has additionally been convicted of distributing more than 25 TB of copyrighted digital content.

From spring 2022 to mid-2023, the user known as "KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted sexually explicit clips featuring over 100 actresses.

He shared them in the forum he was a moderator of.

According to the Denmark's copyright protection organization The Rights Alliance (TRA), his subreddit had more than 6,000 subscribers and users were prompted to request clips of specific performers.

In 2023, advocates filed the incident to the police on behalf of the affected artists, directors and production companies, which resulted in the forum being closed down.

One actress, among the performers whose explicit scenes were shared in the community, told Danish media at the time she believed there was a distinction between appearing unclothed in a movie and appearing on Reddit.

The actress stated the uploads amounted to "exploitation".

'An important signal'

The defendant was detained in September 2024 and admitted culpable to the allegations last month.

In a comment following the ruling, TRA head the organization's leader remarked the decision sent an "significant" signal "indicating infringements of creators' entitlements have repercussions".

The ruling is viewed as unprecedented in the country for its application of the "ethical protections" section of the national copyright law, which specifies an artist's work cannot be utilized in a manner which infringes upon their reputation.

Copyright law specialist a legal scholar told the media the legal matter was "rare" for its emphasis on the damage to the integrity of an artist, rather than to them financially.

How the case could influence other countries is uncertain.

But she said there may be "an increasing number of such cases" in the coming years with the growth of AI, where "the sanctity of an individual's creative output might be compromised much more easily".