🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are observing closely to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of nations are exploring comparable bans.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that smartphones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". The policy is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on parliament to enact a proposal lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a non-binding statement calling for a ban for under-16s without parental consent is provided. While it warns of the "addictive" quality of these services, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a useful starting point," said one MEP supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the government has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in strong data".

Previously, interest built behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to disturbing platform posts contends that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, legislation is largely occurring at the regional government level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed laws demanding parental consent for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from some figures to mimic this lead, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond these regions, further countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global agencies strike a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The organization notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve user protection.

As this international discussion unfolds, the policies of Australia and its followers show that governments globally are increasingly willing to delay for platforms to make changes on their own.